<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Eminent Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theeminentdomain.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theeminentdomain.org</link>
	<description>Building Power and a Livable New York</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank you, Mattie! by mattie</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/05/16/thank-you-mattie/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>mattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/?p=94#comment-332</guid>
		<description>It was my pleasure, and don't worry...I won't be a stranger 'round these parts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was my pleasure, and don&#8217;t worry&#8230;I won&#8217;t be a stranger &#8217;round these parts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Challenges to the 125th Street Rezoning by TrueHarlemite</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/28/more-challenges-to-the-125th-street-rezoning/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueHarlemite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/?p=89#comment-311</guid>
		<description>The majority of Harlem Residents did not want this rezoning plan to go though.  Harlem Residents understand the need for development but not in this way.  The original plan and the Inez Dickens’s modified plan  guarantees the destruction of the cultural fabric of the Village of Harlem and it also guarantees the happiness of money grubbing Developers (Including Council Member Inez Dickens) who do not give a d..mn about Harlem.  

The Village also has need to protect itself from Vote People's director (Craig Schley) and the shady Harlem Politicians.  Schley is just "1" degree away from the underhanded sliminess of Harlem Politicians.

He is in this game so he can get name and face recognition (Mr. Wilhelmina Model man).  Then he wants to run against Congressman Charles Rangel.  Schley does not really care about Harlem and gets his information about Harlem by "mooching" information from those knowledgeable about Harlem.  

Harlem can and must do better than Schley as a candidate against Rangel who the Village does need to get rid of.

Remember it really is all about him.

TH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of Harlem Residents did not want this rezoning plan to go though.  Harlem Residents understand the need for development but not in this way.  The original plan and the Inez Dickens’s modified plan  guarantees the destruction of the cultural fabric of the Village of Harlem and it also guarantees the happiness of money grubbing Developers (Including Council Member Inez Dickens) who do not give a d..mn about Harlem.  </p>
<p>The Village also has need to protect itself from Vote People&#8217;s director (Craig Schley) and the shady Harlem Politicians.  Schley is just &#8220;1&#8243; degree away from the underhanded sliminess of Harlem Politicians.</p>
<p>He is in this game so he can get name and face recognition (Mr. Wilhelmina Model man).  Then he wants to run against Congressman Charles Rangel.  Schley does not really care about Harlem and gets his information about Harlem by &#8220;mooching&#8221; information from those knowledgeable about Harlem.  </p>
<p>Harlem can and must do better than Schley as a candidate against Rangel who the Village does need to get rid of.</p>
<p>Remember it really is all about him.</p>
<p>TH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Challenges to the 125th Street Rezoning by PB</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/28/more-challenges-to-the-125th-street-rezoning/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/?p=89#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Seems the City Boards are the most reasonable and the City Council is willing to hear them. So the "VOTE" group is now farther to the fringe attempting to block the hearing. Is the City Boards compromize a reflection that the Boards stand with the City as opposed to the people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems the City Boards are the most reasonable and the City Council is willing to hear them. So the &#8220;VOTE&#8221; group is now farther to the fringe attempting to block the hearing. Is the City Boards compromize a reflection that the Boards stand with the City as opposed to the people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Challenges to the 125th Street Rezoning by f</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/28/more-challenges-to-the-125th-street-rezoning/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/?p=89#comment-303</guid>
		<description>We Harlem ressidents want the rezoning to go through!!! Enough is enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We Harlem ressidents want the rezoning to go through!!! Enough is enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Kingsbridge Break Through? by Friday Links Roundup &#171;</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/25/can-kingsbridge-break-through/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Links Roundup &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/?p=86#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] Redevelopment Alliance (KARA), is calling for a community benefits agreement for the project. The Eminent Domain writes that KARA, &#8220;is trying to wrest the whole concept of a community benefits agreement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Redevelopment Alliance (KARA), is calling for a community benefits agreement for the project. The Eminent Domain writes that KARA, &#8220;is trying to wrest the whole concept of a community benefits agreement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Willets Point the Way? by Patricia</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/02/13/can-willets-point-the-way/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/02/13/can-willets-point-the-way/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;WILLETS POINT INDUSTRY AND REALTY ASSOCIATION LAUNCHES AD CAMPAIGN IN NEW YORK DAILY NEWS DEMANDING INFRASTRUCTURE AND BASIC SERVICES&lt;/b&gt;

(NEW YORK) NY April 5, 2008 -- In an Open Letter published in the Daily News on Saturday, April 5th, the Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA) invites Mayor Michael Bloomberg to a meeting in Willets Point, Queens to discuss their vision of the area’s future.

The Open Letter was the first in a series of ads in the Daily News and Queens Chronicle. A similar Open Letter appears in the April 3rd edition of the Queens Chronicle, addressed to Mayor Bloomberg and Queens Borough President Helen Marshall. In that letter, the Queens Borough President is also invited to meet with the second and third generation land and business owners in Willets Point.

The City of New York is proposing to rezone it Willets Point, condemn it and evict the existing businesses through the use of Eminent Domain and replace them with 1.7 million feet of retail space, 500,000 square feet of office space, a hotel, 5,500 residential housing units and a convention center in the neighborhood that is currently zoned for heavy industry. To make this proposal a reality, the City must first acquire the 60 acres of privately owned land at Willets Point. WPIRA maintains that the City of New York has planned to rezone and redevelop for many years and has been waging a campaign of intentional neglect to create and perpetuate an eyesore for the eventual justification of the use of Eminent Domain. 

In the Open Letter to Mayor Bloomberg, business owners write: “Our businesses generate hundreds of millions of tax revenue dollars for the City of New York. We have survived and even thrived at Willets Point despite the fact that for the past 30 years, the City has perpetually deprived us of the most basic services such as sanitary sewers, paved roads, sidewalks, street lights, snow removal and trash pick-up.”

“We agree that Willets Point needs to be developed.  Our solution is to allow the area to develop on its own. If the City provided the infrastructure and services that we are entitled to and in fact, are paying for, this will happen.  The City plans to spend upward of three billion dollars to redevelop Willets Point.  However, with the current credit crisis and increasing construction costs, we can certainly expect those costs to balloon to a multiple of that number.  It doesn’t make economic sense in light of your budget cuts to our police, schools and hospitals.”

WPIRA members appeal to the Mayor: “We ask that you meet with us and our employees, learn about our businesses and our challenges, and walk the “streets” of Willets Point with us.  Let us share our vision of the future of Willets Point with you.  Let’s work together because to continue to look the other way is to deny our existence; and to invoke Eminent Domain is to steal our land and businesses.  It’s unjust and it’s un-American.”

The members of WPIRA believe that the area would be revitalized if the City spent a fraction of the capital required for redevelopment and invested in infrastructure for the area. The New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) conducted a study of the area in 1991 that suggested exactly that. “If the City provided the infrastructure and services that we are entitled to and in fact, are paying for, the area would be revitalized,” said Dan Feinstein, President of Feinstein Iron Works, Inc. The estimated cost of redeveloping the area is upwards of three billion dollars. That estimate is expected to skyrocket given the credit crisis and increasing construction costs. 

A second ad will run in the Sunday, April 6th edition of the Daily News. It is a letter to all New Yorkers from the workers at Willets Point. The workers write: “New York City plans to use Eminent Domain to seize the land from all 250 businesses and property owners in Willets Point, to enrich a politically connected developer. The developer will earn hundreds of millions of dollars in profits. We will lose our jobs, our economic security, and we could lose our homes. What will happen to us? What will happen to our families? What will happen to our hopes and our American Dreams?

In the ad, the workers state their opposition to the City’s intended use of Eminent Domain and join their employers in demanding services. New Yorkers are reminded that the situation in Willets Point could happen anywhere: “Neighborhoods all over New York City from the Atlantic Yards and Coney Island in Brooklyn to Harlem in Manhattan are facing Eminent Domain. And you could be next. Join us in calling or writing your elected officials. Remind them you are taxpaying voters and you oppose Eminent Domain because it is unjust and un-American.”

The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association will hold a press conference on the steps of New York City Hall on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 11am to demand infrastructure and services. A major announcement regarding this issue will be made at the press conference. 

The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA)
The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA) is dedicated to the development, improvement and growth of the Willets Point area by the businesses that reside there, and not by development schemes in which eminent domain is used to forcibly evict and raze those businesses. A. Fodera &#38; Son, Inc., Bono Sawdust Supply Co., Inc., Crown Container Co., Inc., Feinstein Iron Works, Inc., House of Spices (India), Inc., Parts Authority, Inc., QC Iron Works Inc., Sambucci Bros. Inc, T. Mina Supply, Inc., Tully Environmental, Inc., Tully Construction Co., Inc. www.WPIRA.com

Contact:
willetspoint@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>WILLETS POINT INDUSTRY AND REALTY ASSOCIATION LAUNCHES AD CAMPAIGN IN NEW YORK DAILY NEWS DEMANDING INFRASTRUCTURE AND BASIC SERVICES</b></p>
<p>(NEW YORK) NY April 5, 2008 &#8212; In an Open Letter published in the Daily News on Saturday, April 5th, the Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA) invites Mayor Michael Bloomberg to a meeting in Willets Point, Queens to discuss their vision of the area’s future.</p>
<p>The Open Letter was the first in a series of ads in the Daily News and Queens Chronicle. A similar Open Letter appears in the April 3rd edition of the Queens Chronicle, addressed to Mayor Bloomberg and Queens Borough President Helen Marshall. In that letter, the Queens Borough President is also invited to meet with the second and third generation land and business owners in Willets Point.</p>
<p>The City of New York is proposing to rezone it Willets Point, condemn it and evict the existing businesses through the use of Eminent Domain and replace them with 1.7 million feet of retail space, 500,000 square feet of office space, a hotel, 5,500 residential housing units and a convention center in the neighborhood that is currently zoned for heavy industry. To make this proposal a reality, the City must first acquire the 60 acres of privately owned land at Willets Point. WPIRA maintains that the City of New York has planned to rezone and redevelop for many years and has been waging a campaign of intentional neglect to create and perpetuate an eyesore for the eventual justification of the use of Eminent Domain. </p>
<p>In the Open Letter to Mayor Bloomberg, business owners write: “Our businesses generate hundreds of millions of tax revenue dollars for the City of New York. We have survived and even thrived at Willets Point despite the fact that for the past 30 years, the City has perpetually deprived us of the most basic services such as sanitary sewers, paved roads, sidewalks, street lights, snow removal and trash pick-up.”</p>
<p>“We agree that Willets Point needs to be developed.  Our solution is to allow the area to develop on its own. If the City provided the infrastructure and services that we are entitled to and in fact, are paying for, this will happen.  The City plans to spend upward of three billion dollars to redevelop Willets Point.  However, with the current credit crisis and increasing construction costs, we can certainly expect those costs to balloon to a multiple of that number.  It doesn’t make economic sense in light of your budget cuts to our police, schools and hospitals.”</p>
<p>WPIRA members appeal to the Mayor: “We ask that you meet with us and our employees, learn about our businesses and our challenges, and walk the “streets” of Willets Point with us.  Let us share our vision of the future of Willets Point with you.  Let’s work together because to continue to look the other way is to deny our existence; and to invoke Eminent Domain is to steal our land and businesses.  It’s unjust and it’s un-American.”</p>
<p>The members of WPIRA believe that the area would be revitalized if the City spent a fraction of the capital required for redevelopment and invested in infrastructure for the area. The New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) conducted a study of the area in 1991 that suggested exactly that. “If the City provided the infrastructure and services that we are entitled to and in fact, are paying for, the area would be revitalized,” said Dan Feinstein, President of Feinstein Iron Works, Inc. The estimated cost of redeveloping the area is upwards of three billion dollars. That estimate is expected to skyrocket given the credit crisis and increasing construction costs. </p>
<p>A second ad will run in the Sunday, April 6th edition of the Daily News. It is a letter to all New Yorkers from the workers at Willets Point. The workers write: “New York City plans to use Eminent Domain to seize the land from all 250 businesses and property owners in Willets Point, to enrich a politically connected developer. The developer will earn hundreds of millions of dollars in profits. We will lose our jobs, our economic security, and we could lose our homes. What will happen to us? What will happen to our families? What will happen to our hopes and our American Dreams?</p>
<p>In the ad, the workers state their opposition to the City’s intended use of Eminent Domain and join their employers in demanding services. New Yorkers are reminded that the situation in Willets Point could happen anywhere: “Neighborhoods all over New York City from the Atlantic Yards and Coney Island in Brooklyn to Harlem in Manhattan are facing Eminent Domain. And you could be next. Join us in calling or writing your elected officials. Remind them you are taxpaying voters and you oppose Eminent Domain because it is unjust and un-American.”</p>
<p>The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association will hold a press conference on the steps of New York City Hall on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 11am to demand infrastructure and services. A major announcement regarding this issue will be made at the press conference. </p>
<p>The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA)<br />
The Willets Point Industry and Realty Association (WPIRA) is dedicated to the development, improvement and growth of the Willets Point area by the businesses that reside there, and not by development schemes in which eminent domain is used to forcibly evict and raze those businesses. A. Fodera &amp; Son, Inc., Bono Sawdust Supply Co., Inc., Crown Container Co., Inc., Feinstein Iron Works, Inc., House of Spices (India), Inc., Parts Authority, Inc., QC Iron Works Inc., Sambucci Bros. Inc, T. Mina Supply, Inc., Tully Environmental, Inc., Tully Construction Co., Inc. <a href="http://www.WPIRA.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.WPIRA.com</a></p>
<p>Contact:<br />
<a href="mailto:willetspoint@gmail.com">willetspoint@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Property Owners Protest 125 Rezoning by Phil</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/01/property-owners-protest-125-rezoning/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/04/01/property-owners-protest-125-rezoning/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I wonder whether a council vote would realize a three fourths majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I wonder whether a council vote would realize a three fourths majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Admirals&#8217; Row Have It Both Ways? by Brownstoner</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/02/27/can-admirals-row-have-it-both-ways/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Brownstoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/2008/02/27/can-admirals-row-have-it-both-ways/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I knew I'd heard that somewhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I&#8217;d heard that somewhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PLANguage by Harlem Pleads for Responsible Rezoning &#124; the eminent domain</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/planguage/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlem Pleads for Responsible Rezoning &#124; the eminent domain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/planguage/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] City Economic Development Corporation&#8217;s four years of careful engagement with Harlem&#8217;s local civic organizations around plans to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] City Economic Development Corporation&#8217;s four years of careful engagement with Harlem&#8217;s local civic organizations around plans to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Shakedown Libel by CBAs in NYC: What&#8217;s Going Wrong? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://theeminentdomain.org/2007/12/20/the-shakedown-libel/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>CBAs in NYC: What&#8217;s Going Wrong? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeminentdomain.org/2007/12/20/the-shakedown-libel/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] traditional CBAs.  What with the delay in community benefits from the Yankee Stadium agreement and recent controversy over the Columbia deal, Metro wonders if NYC is setting a bad example for the rest of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] traditional CBAs.  What with the delay in community benefits from the Yankee Stadium agreement and recent controversy over the Columbia deal, Metro wonders if NYC is setting a bad example for the rest of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
